Oil Demand in 2030: Contrasting Views from IEA and OPEC
- umme51
- Dec 14, 2024
- 2 min read
Diverging Forecasts on Oil Demand by 2030
Global energy is a trillion dollar business and forecasting future demand for oil is a challenging endeavor, marked by a variety of economic, environmental, geopolitical and technological factors. Two leading authorities in energy forecasting—the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)—offer strikingly different views on the future of oil demand by 2030.
They both agree that operators, service companies and drillers are in the midst of expanding the global supply from the current supply of around 102 million barrels per day. The planned expansion is 5-10% depending on the forecast, or 5+ million bpd. However, looking ahead to 2030 the forecasts diverge in what happens to demand.
The IEA's recent report suggests a scenario where oil demand could peak soon due to increasing energy efficiency, the rise of electric vehicles, and a shift towards alternative energy sources. According to their analysis, there could be a major surplus in oil capacity by 2030 as global oil demand begins to decline (IEA report). The IEA forecast predicts demand leveling off around 106 million bpd, setting up excess supply of 1-6 million bpd.

Conversely, OPEC maintains a more bullish outlook on oil demand. Their forecasts indicate that oil demand will not only continue to grow but may not peak until after 2030. This perspective hinges on ongoing industrial growth in developing regions and slower adoption rates of alternative energy technologies (OPEC's forecast). The OPEC forecast predicts demand at 108 million bpd, with demand growing into the 2030’s.
The discrepancy between these forecasts is notable and raises important questions about the factors influencing each organization's outlook. Without offering a personal stance, it is crucial to recognize the complexity and uncertainty inherent in global energy modeling. These divergent paths underscore the varied assumptions and methodologies used by the IEA and OPEC, reflecting different perspectives on economic growth, technological progress, and policy developments globally.
As stakeholders in the energy sector, or anyone interested in the future of global energy dynamics, understanding these forecasts' differences helps us appreciate the challenges and intricacies of energy planning on a global scale. We are all too familiar with the boom and bust cycles.
Comments